SecondLife: Captchas Not Good Enough for Land Buying - But For Buying/Selling Linden Dollars, It Is OK?
A few weeks ago, Torley got set upon by people who deal in land within SecondLife. In fairness, this isn't what Torley deals with - but one of the suggestions that kept popping up was the addition of a captcha to land purchasing so that issues regarding landbots would be diminished, if even for a while. Personally, I'm not a big fan of this approach but acknowledge that they could help1.
Still, the reasoning behind not using captchas was explained as being an usability issue for those who are colorblind. I can run with that. Of course, captchas do not have to be in color, as the snapshot to the right demonstrates.
But then to see captchas in use on the SecondLife website when purchasing/selling Linden dollars? What's up with that? In the context of land buying, captchas like that could be useful - and save some people some money. It can be beaten - I know that; I have worked on image recognition software in the past - but it isn't necessarily as easy to do and requires a lot of understanding to maintain such a piece of software which recognizes captchas.
Me? I still go with the 5 minute limit. It's simple, it's easy to implement and it also means that if you don't catch an error within 5 minutes, there's no real way one can complain legitimately.
1Instead, I would prefer a 5 minute delay between setting land for sale and having it appear in the land search within SecondLife such that if a mistake is made or a network/software glitch occurs, it can be corrected during that period.

You know, this is a common
You know, this is a common practice among certain types of people. I often encounter this when dealing with certain computer programmers, for example.
When confronting someone of this particular type of personality with a problem that would 1) change the status quo of implementation; 2) require relatively higher degree of effort to implement and debug; 3) require skills that said person does not have; and/or 4) not of enough personal interest to said person, the typical response is to conjure up what can only be described as "excuses", often inconsistent and contradictory to what is already implemented. To these people, it is difficult to say something as easy as "that's a reasonable idea, but there is apparently not enough interest or priority to implement it" or "that's an unreasonable idea and it's not implemented anywhere else because it's such an unreasonable idea." Though in the latter case, such is often extremely difficult to say because the proposal is usually implemented elsewhere and saying that would cause an obvious inconsistency. I think the "reasoning" behind the CAPTCHA that is mentioned in this post is a prime example of that.
I can recall other examples where people have proposed features that were rejected on grounds like "it would add too many features and configurations that few people would use", never mind the fact that there are already such described features, and even undocumented features only available by editing XML settings files. Sometimes these types of people can be spotted on JIRA as well.
And of course there are some people who make these sort of "reasoned" (inconsistent/illogical) arguments merely out of self interest, believing that if developers spent their time on that issue, they would spend less time on issues for which they have actual concern.
I myself do not necessarily think landbots need to be thwarted except to the extent that they may cause justified grievances, whether or not intentional, especially for non-technical people (such as taking advantage of a bug or bad implementation that puts land for sale at an unintended price for a fraction of a second).
Interesting delayed listing idea. I wonder if it's on JIRA...
If it's on JIRA, I didn't add it.
Wrestling with JIRA is simply not something I am interested in doing right now. Someone else can do that if I don't get around to it. Actually, I may do that today and comment on how many flaming hoops a user has to go through... for example, there's no direct link to JIRA that I can find on the SecondLife website. The blog has a link which dumps to a Wiki page which is not very clear on navigation. If you can find the secret link in there...
Now, I am a technical person. I could probably find my way into JIRA - I may have once or twice before - but it's sort of like going to a dentist. I hate going to the dentist, so I found an attractive female dentist who I can flirt with. I *still* hate going to the dentist.
I have mentioned the delay directly via email to the Lindens and told a few people my thoughts.
Hey. Open letters seem to work better than JIRA... maybe if I say something bad about unverified accounts, Linden Lab will listen. That seems to work. :-)
It *is* on JIRA...
But in my spelunking, I couldn't find a way to support it. Here's the story of the journey.
Re: SecondLife: Captchas
As second life grows and grows, this is something that will need to be addressed. We don't want to give robots the same status as humans. I personally would rather keep the mechanically minded out of the world completely in the sense that they approximate human behavious. I would be more than willing to fill out a captcha whenever and wherever necessary to keep exploitative robots out of the world.
Post new comment