Reply to comment

"But the whole basis on verifieds versus unverifieds itself cannot be proven without some statistics, so it's very shakey (at best). I believe if you're going to propose a solution, you should have your foot on solid ground."

I think that's a fair comment, and to be honest one that should have been foreseen. Drafts of the letter were posted at SC, in public - so it's not like there wasn't chance for people to object to those phrases earlier. Remember that no effort like this is perfect.

But there's a simple answer: take the letter text, delete the bits about unverifieds, and post it yourself. Let people who agree with the overall sentiment but object to the bits about unverifieds sign that one - not as some kind of contest between different view points, but to show that we're all united in asking Linden Lab to take these issues seriously.

If you want to draft it, I'll happily host it.